$700 for the protection of one's precious data over several years does not seem excessive, as oppose to if I lose those data, I would be willing to pay almost anything to get it back. Setup can be used for several years without recurring fees. The grand total is about $700, a one time fee. So actually, I only need to buy one more)
ARQ BACKUP WEBDAV LICENSE
Thus, online storage is free for me else is $10 per month.ĪRQ: lifetime license $80 ( I have an edu discount), regular license $50ģ pieces of 2TB seagate ultra slim hard drive each, total $210 ( however, I have been using two such hard drives to do time machine backups. But I have been doing that for the time machine backup anyway.ĭropbox: I have a 1TB storage plan and is using only 15GB.
ARQ BACKUP WEBDAV SOFTWARE
(It will be great if there is a way to pair the backup software and HD permanently and thus avoid the need to do it manually everyday.) Of course, I will need to remember to connect the hard drives to the Mac for backups to take place. After setup, the backups will run automatically in the background without interrupting work except each day when I start using the computer, I will need to setup which software backups to which hard drive. All I need to do is to buy ARQ, CCC and four hard drives. This strategy seems to satisfy the 3-2-1 requirement and seems to be easily implemented and easily executed as It does not requires much technical skill. The probability for these disasters to happen is not zero. The redundancy and duplication are designed to recover from disasters such as stupid mistake of backing up to the wrong drive ruining its contents, mistaken source as destination, data corruption causing backing up garbage without knowing it, multiple HD failures, or unforeseen problem with the backup software, etc. One of CCC bootable backup is on SSD, with the purpose that it could be used to boot up any Mac in time of emergency. (3) for the two local locations, each location does two types of backup, one made by time machine and one made by CCC. (2) backups stored at three different locations: two locally (office and home) and one online, (1) backup by three different methods: time machine, Carbon Copy Cloner and ARQ Twenty thousands of research papers that I will not be able to find them and read them again and years of experimental results that I will not be able to do them all over again.įollowing the discussions on this thread, the backup strategy I had just conceived is: I have 500GB data on my Mac if I lose them, I will never recover professionally. Your comments on my backup strategy will be appreciated. If ARQ does not know the source has changed, it will free up my newer Mac to do my daily work. Does ARQ know the source for the initial and subsequent backups are not the same, but their contents are the same? OR ARQ treats them as two totally different backups, so I will have two backups online corresponding to the two different sources used. Is this possible?Īfter the initial backup of the SSD clone, for all subsequent backups, I will then switch back to use the newer MAC instead. Or just use the old Mac as the main computer and do an ARQ backup Of an external drive, the SSD. At this point, is it possible to do an ARQ backup of the SSD only? The SSD has the same contents as the newer Mac. It is the newer Mac that I want to do an initial backup, which is well known to take days or weeks.Īn external SSD is used to clone the newer MAC then then It is further used to externally boot the older Mac. I have an old Mac that does not have enough storage to support all my data stored in a newer Mac. So I hope ARQ will help this group of users more and make it as easy to use as time machine. There comes ARQ which takes away the complexities, make it easy to do online backup. We are not technical, have been relying on time machine to protect our data and are perplexed about online backups it just seems so many issues to understand, just overwhelming. But I don't understand why time machine can restore all the user installed applications but ARQ can not.Īs the cost of terabyte online backups becomes very affordable, Perhaps there is a large number of users like me, who have precious data to protect and are potential ARQ customers. I understand some applications can be restored by ARQ and some can not, as explained by weaselboy earlier. I also know that there are super duper and carbon copy cloner that can backup the entire drive. Also is there a fundamental reason why ARQ can not backup the entire Machintoh HD? I know it is not the purpose of ARQ and perhaps there is not a need for those who are technically savvy. Assume ARQ allows user to select and add folders in addition to home folder, Is it possible to select folders such that the ARQ backup is equivalent to the time machine backup? That is from time machine like to time machine equivalent.
0 kommentar(er)
